El comercio electrónico chino ya es terrible, ¿Por qué Amazon todavía implementa servicios de reembolso y no devolución??

Del entorno del comercio electrónico en China, Podemos ver que una política de solo reembolsar y no devolver productos solo conducirá a productos de menor calidad comprados en sitios web de compras..

en china, desde la aparición de la versión china de Temu, Los comerciantes en la plataforma han estado compitiendo constantemente por precios más bajos.. La plataforma ha atraído a un gran número de usuarios., pero todas las plataformas de comercio electrónico en China han seguido el modelo de precios bajos de Temu..

Los precios bajos no son un problema., ¿Pero es realmente bueno mantenerlos bajos??

Sí, Chinese e-commerce platforms have become so abnormal that they require high-quality products to compete with lower prices, otherwise they will not give up traffic. This has led to a large number of merchants giving up product quality and choosing cheaper raw materials to manufacture products.

Merchants are not doing charity work. The e-commerce environment in China has made it difficult for businesses that use cheap materials to survive and have closed down one after another.

The bankruptcy of merchants is caused by normal business competition, but the problem is that the entire network is filled with low-quality products.

So why does Amazon still follow suit and support return and non refund services?

Perhaps due to the impact of foreign e-commerce platforms, Amazon has lost a large number of users. Sin embargo, in the long run, the quality of products sold by Temu from China is very poor. Therefore, I still hope that Amazon can protect the interests of merchants, make them profitable, and not improve product quality. At least not let merchants start selling ‘garbage’!